The form is not the goal-Tai Chi and calligraphy
May 26, 2009
Magda, a Tai Chi friend and I were sitting outside in the late spring sun at a wonderful sheltered café yesterday after class. We were talking about the discipline of learning Tai Chi.
I keep seeing parallels between tai chi and calligraphy. But I get stuck on the fact that Tai chi demands a traditional repetition of form, as does calligraphy, but with calligraphy I find this restrictive and with Tai Chi it is not. I guess I feel that the goal of learning calligraphy is to not just parrot the letters but to eventually use them to express yourself. So creativity is a goal for learning the technique. With Tai Chi, creativity isn’t a goal, but still something similar is at play here .
Magda commented that the deeper you get into Tai Chi practice, the more you realize that learning to do the form (Tai Chi ‘form’ is the sequence of movements) is not the end goal.
She pointed out that through disciplined practice of Tai Chi, you move beyond the form. You no longer have to think consciously about the movements, the movements become a channel for the energy as it moves through you and around you. But to experience this one first has to master (to some degree) the movements.
Our whole class is at the point where we can all do Tai Chi in a flowing decorative way that would impress anyone who knew nothing about it. And every new student aspires to this goal of external appearance and achievement. But once there, you either quit because as a goal in itself it is dead ended. Or you hit a wall because you realize how little you really know.
If you stay with the practice regardless, and just keep going, eventually it all opens out again in a new way. Your teacher points out how the tineist adjustments to thought and movement can radically change your experience of your own body and thus the form. It becomes an ongoing journey of learning and deepening. The form is not the end goal, but the medium for discovering about energy as it flows up from the earth through your body, or from the stars down to your toes. It teaches you about how your joints function, and how to use them better, You learn how to distribute your weight, how to hold your head, how to maintain a relaxed tension deep in the muscles, so every gesture is loaded with grace and power. Tai Chi touches on so many aspects of life: your health, your emotional well being, your balance, how your body uses energy, your concentration, your mental picture of yourself, how you relate to the space around you, how you stand and walk, how you relate to others, your weak and strong points. It is endless.
I suppose calligraphy too could be approached as a spiritual practice of sorts. Because in the end, all these disciplines- Tai Chi, calligraphy, dance music, writing, alternative therapies, etc, are just keys to universal truths that seem to run throughout all of life. You just have to be alert to them, and practice seems to be one effective way of achieving that.
What Evert taught me
March 22, 2009

Book inscription from Dutch calligrapher, Evert van Dijk
One of my oldest and dearest friends here in Holland is an impassioned calligrapher and retired teacher of handicapped children.
My encounter with him when I first came to live here changed my life as an artist irrevocably. Evert saw my dilemma clearly. I was no longer growing artistically because I was caught in the prison of the prevailing aesthetic in the middleclass American milieu where I grew up. I’d learned that art had to be ‘beautiful’ and that my calligraphy had to be as close to perfection as the human hand would allow.
Evert, with his wonderfully ebullient personality and outspoken views, blasted through that shell of pretense and released my authenticity. I think this is the task of all true teachers and mentors.
This altered view is also what releases calligraphy from craft and lifts it to art. My letters and mark making became much more expressive of who I was, and this had a ripple effect throughout my life; one I am only truly coming to understand about 20 years later.
In the article I am writing about art and dementia care, this theme of authenticity keeps reappearing.
Artists accept people with dementia as completely whole, viable, interesting human beings, and therefore often elicit lucid repsonses where trained staff have failed. In an art session, the person ’s markmaking is seen in the context of authenticity rather than conventional aesthetics. I am not after a pretty picture (this would expose the person and me to the potential of ‘failure’) instead, I look for interaction and engagement. The rules change, a person’s raw and spontaneous line becomes the new context for ’beautiful’. The Japanese have a philosphy of aesthetics based on this called Wabi Sabi*.
It is the ability to see the worth in something or someone just as they are without requiring that they fit a preconceived ideal.
*Wabi Sabi is an asethetic of the fragile, weathered and transient. It is the opposite of the Western tendency to aspire to the imposing, large and powerful. We idealize a perfect rose in bloom, Wabi Sabi cherishes the rose past its prime: a chipped flea market wooden table with flaking paint as opposed to the latest design statement in glass and chrome.
Shining through form
April 15, 2008
Continuing on from the previous post- ‘Old Calligraphy, old territory’, I want to explain what it is I look for in a work of art.
I want to be moved, taken out of the ordinary, jolted into a new perception, given the key to a new world. I want to meet someone at heart level, at soul level through their work. I want to be returned to myself to know who I really am at my best and deepest. I want to be given an experience of wholeness and solace. I want to be opened, pried or blasted, it doesn’t matter. I want to be left with the feeling of, ‘It is a beautiful world after all, despite everything’.
Pretty high demands, one might say, but it has happened to me repeatedly, with music, theatre, painting drawing, poetry, etc.
But here is a paradox: The artists that create work capable of giving this experience aren’t necessarily making ‘beautiful’ things in the conventional sense of the word. I find that what moves me, whether it is a drawing by a child or a painting by a master is something ‘true’ shining out of the work.
Eckhart Tolle, author of ‘The Power of Now’ and ‘A new Earth’, puts it this way:
Pseudo art is clever minds trying to be more clever, manipulating old forms. Nothing new has come in.
Nothing in that kind of art can lead you back into the formless which is the original reason for art—to be a portal, an access point for the sacred so that when you see/experience it you experience yourself. In it you see the formless reflected, shining through form. -From a talk given at Findhorn in 2004
He goes on to say that true art always contains another dimension than just what you see or hear. It is always more. And the ‘more’ is the energy that emanates from the work. He says too that this kind of power comes from a place of stillness.
And that leads me to a whole new thread, to be continued.
